<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PhotoRadarScam Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Information about Photo Speed and Radar Enforcement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ATS, Tucson: Do As We Say, Not As We Do by Fred Sboddi</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/ats-defies-city-ordinances-as-well/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Sboddi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2009/09/07/ats-defies-city-ordinances-as-well/#comment-451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Section 2A.18 Mounting Height

Standard:
01 The provisions of this Section shall apply unless specifically stated otherwise for a particular sign or object marker elsewhere in this Manual.

Support:
02 The mounting height requirements for object markers are provided in Chapter 2C.

03 In addition to the provisions of this Section, information affecting the minimum mounting height of signs as a function of crash performance can be 
found in AASHTO&#039;s &quot;Roadside Design Guide&quot; (see Section 1A.11).

Standard:
04 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the pavement, of signs installed at the side 
of the road in rural areas shall be 5 feet (see Figure 2A-2).

05 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the top of the curb, or in the absence of curb, measured vertically from the 
bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the traveled way, of signs installed at the side of the road in business, commercial, or residential 
areas where parking or pedestrian movements are likely to occur, or where the view of the sign might be obstructed, shall be 7 feet (see Figure 2A-2).

Option:
06 The height to the bottom of a secondary sign mounted below another sign may be 1 foot less than the height specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5.

Standard:
07 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the sidewalk, of signs installed above sidewalks shall be 7 feet.

08 If the bottom of a secondary sign that is mounted below another sign is mounted lower than 7 feet above a pedestrian sidewalk or pathway 
(see Section 6D.02), the secondary sign shall not project more than 4 inches into the pedestrian facility.





Traffic Laws
Photo Enforced 	R10-18 	2B.55 	36 x 24 	36 x 24 	48 x 30 	54 x 36 	— 	54 x 36
Photo Enforced (symbol plaque) 	R10-19P 	2B.55 	24 x 12 	24 x 12 	36 x 18 	48 x 24 	— 	48 x 24
Photo Enforced (plaque) 	R10-19aP 	2B.55 	24 x 18 	24 x 18 	36 x 30 	48 x 36 	— 	48 x 36



Section 6F  Temporary Signs

Guidance:
11 Except as provided in Paragraph 12, signs mounted on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4 
through 6 should not be used for a duration of more than 3 days.

Option:
12 The R9-8 through R9-11a series, R11 series, W1-6 through W1-8 series, M4-10, E5-1, or other similar type signs (see Figures 6F-3, 6F-4, and 6F-5) 
may be used on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4 through 6 for longer than 3 days.

Support:
13 Methods of mounting signs other than on posts are illustrated in Figure 6F-2.




Section 6B.01 Fundamental Principles of Temporary Traffic Control

Support:
01 Construction, maintenance, utility, and incident zones can all benefit from TTC to compensate for the unexpected or unusual situations 
faced by road users. When planning for TTC in these zones, it can be assumed that it is appropriate for road users to exercise caution. Even 
though road users are assumed to be using caution, special care is still needed in applying TTC techniques.



SPEED LIMIT

How does the Town of Prescott Valley determine speed limits?

The Town of Prescott Valley follows the guidelines set forth in the Arizona State Statutes and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 
to set speed limits in our town. The State Statutes allow local authorities to determine speed limits on streets based on an &quot;engineering and traffic 
investigation.&quot; The MUTCD provides the criteria that are used for the engineering study. The MUTCD states that the speed limit should be within 5 mph 
of the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic (the speed at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling at or less than). It also allows consideration 
of road characteristics, roadside development, parking and pedestrian activity, and crash experience. Most of our studies are in areas where the roadside 
environment is changing due to development or where we have an inordinately high number of accidents. Studies may also be based on citizen requests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 2A.18 Mounting Height</p>
<p>Standard:<br />
01 The provisions of this Section shall apply unless specifically stated otherwise for a particular sign or object marker elsewhere in this Manual.</p>
<p>Support:<br />
02 The mounting height requirements for object markers are provided in Chapter 2C.</p>
<p>03 In addition to the provisions of this Section, information affecting the minimum mounting height of signs as a function of crash performance can be<br />
found in AASHTO&#8217;s &#8220;Roadside Design Guide&#8221; (see Section 1A.11).</p>
<p>Standard:<br />
04 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the pavement, of signs installed at the side<br />
of the road in rural areas shall be 5 feet (see Figure 2A-2).</p>
<p>05 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the top of the curb, or in the absence of curb, measured vertically from the<br />
bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the traveled way, of signs installed at the side of the road in business, commercial, or residential<br />
areas where parking or pedestrian movements are likely to occur, or where the view of the sign might be obstructed, shall be 7 feet (see Figure 2A-2).</p>
<p>Option:<br />
06 The height to the bottom of a secondary sign mounted below another sign may be 1 foot less than the height specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5.</p>
<p>Standard:<br />
07 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the sidewalk, of signs installed above sidewalks shall be 7 feet.</p>
<p>08 If the bottom of a secondary sign that is mounted below another sign is mounted lower than 7 feet above a pedestrian sidewalk or pathway<br />
(see Section 6D.02), the secondary sign shall not project more than 4 inches into the pedestrian facility.</p>
<p>Traffic Laws<br />
Photo Enforced 	R10-18 	2B.55 	36 x 24 	36 x 24 	48 x 30 	54 x 36 	— 	54 x 36<br />
Photo Enforced (symbol plaque) 	R10-19P 	2B.55 	24 x 12 	24 x 12 	36 x 18 	48 x 24 	— 	48 x 24<br />
Photo Enforced (plaque) 	R10-19aP 	2B.55 	24 x 18 	24 x 18 	36 x 30 	48 x 36 	— 	48 x 36</p>
<p>Section 6F  Temporary Signs</p>
<p>Guidance:<br />
11 Except as provided in Paragraph 12, signs mounted on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4<br />
through 6 should not be used for a duration of more than 3 days.</p>
<p>Option:<br />
12 The R9-8 through R9-11a series, R11 series, W1-6 through W1-8 series, M4-10, E5-1, or other similar type signs (see Figures 6F-3, 6F-4, and 6F-5)<br />
may be used on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4 through 6 for longer than 3 days.</p>
<p>Support:<br />
13 Methods of mounting signs other than on posts are illustrated in Figure 6F-2.</p>
<p>Section 6B.01 Fundamental Principles of Temporary Traffic Control</p>
<p>Support:<br />
01 Construction, maintenance, utility, and incident zones can all benefit from TTC to compensate for the unexpected or unusual situations<br />
faced by road users. When planning for TTC in these zones, it can be assumed that it is appropriate for road users to exercise caution. Even<br />
though road users are assumed to be using caution, special care is still needed in applying TTC techniques.</p>
<p>SPEED LIMIT</p>
<p>How does the Town of Prescott Valley determine speed limits?</p>
<p>The Town of Prescott Valley follows the guidelines set forth in the Arizona State Statutes and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)<br />
to set speed limits in our town. The State Statutes allow local authorities to determine speed limits on streets based on an &#8220;engineering and traffic<br />
investigation.&#8221; The MUTCD provides the criteria that are used for the engineering study. The MUTCD states that the speed limit should be within 5 mph<br />
of the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic (the speed at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling at or less than). It also allows consideration<br />
of road characteristics, roadside development, parking and pedestrian activity, and crash experience. Most of our studies are in areas where the roadside<br />
environment is changing due to development or where we have an inordinately high number of accidents. Studies may also be based on citizen requests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile Speed Van Signage Illegal by Fred Sboddi</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/mobile-speed-van-signage-illegal/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Sboddi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other consideration is this--  when you are charged for example:

For Going 10 MPH over the posted Limit

They cannot change the charge, because there is no posted limit in the case where there is no sign.

But again, the best defense is intimidation-- make it not worth their trouble-- and then APPEAL when necessary. Pay the extra $50 for appeal court. Make it difficult to uphold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other consideration is this&#8211;  when you are charged for example:</p>
<p>For Going 10 MPH over the posted Limit</p>
<p>They cannot change the charge, because there is no posted limit in the case where there is no sign.</p>
<p>But again, the best defense is intimidation&#8211; make it not worth their trouble&#8211; and then APPEAL when necessary. Pay the extra $50 for appeal court. Make it difficult to uphold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile Speed Van Signage Illegal by Fred Sboddi</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/mobile-speed-van-signage-illegal/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Sboddi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your state requires signage, than that sign almost certainly must meet the definitions of the MUTCD, since every other sign and all traffic control devices nationally must adhere to this manual.

The Federal Standard for regulatory signs, the MUTCD states several things that apply to Photo Radar signs-  but most importantly that there is a minimum height of 5 feet in rural areas and 7 feet in urban areas from the pavement to the bottom of the sign.

Unless there is CONSTRUCTION, or another temporary street condition (an accident, a damage street)- i.e., if the radar van and sign are used in a NORMAL street, non-temporary state- the MUTCD is quite clear-
5 feet rural, 7 feet city.

Your state or city may say something like, &quot;as the Traffic Engineer deems PRACTICAL&quot;--  so you may have to show that it&#039;s practical to use a removable method of posting the sign on an existing support to allow it to be 7 feet off the ground.&quot;  So, the devil is in the details.

The best advice is to show the city attorney that you will fight, and that you will fight with an attorney. Get an attorney to submit a MOTION TO DISMISS before it gets to court. Your chances of winning in front of a judge is practically nil-  even when the city is breaking the law.  City and County Courts exist simply to make money for the city. They are not going to give in easily. YOu have to make them realize that you will be more trouble than is worth their time.

Get  your facts straight, get your evidence, use the MUTCD and specific sections for reference, and if at all possible, get an attorney to submit your motion to dismiss before your court date.

Section 2A.18 Mounting Height

Standard:
01 The provisions of this Section shall apply unless specifically stated otherwise for a particular sign or object marker elsewhere in this Manual.

Support:
02 The mounting height requirements for object markers are provided in Chapter 2C.

03 In addition to the provisions of this Section, information affecting the minimum mounting height of signs as a function of crash performance can be 
found in AASHTO&#039;s &quot;Roadside Design Guide&quot; (see Section 1A.11).

Standard:
04 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the pavement, of signs installed at the side 
of the road in rural areas shall be 5 feet (see Figure 2A-2).

05 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the top of the curb, or in the absence of curb, measured vertically from the 
bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the traveled way, of signs installed at the side of the road in business, commercial, or residential 
areas where parking or pedestrian movements are likely to occur, or where the view of the sign might be obstructed, shall be 7 feet (see Figure 2A-2).

Option:
06 The height to the bottom of a secondary sign mounted below another sign may be 1 foot less than the height specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5.

Standard:
07 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the sidewalk, of signs installed above sidewalks shall be 7 feet.

08 If the bottom of a secondary sign that is mounted below another sign is mounted lower than 7 feet above a pedestrian sidewalk or pathway 
(see Section 6D.02), the secondary sign shall not project more than 4 inches into the pedestrian facility.





Traffic Laws
Photo Enforced 	R10-18 	2B.55 	36 x 24 	36 x 24 	48 x 30 	54 x 36 	— 	54 x 36
Photo Enforced (symbol plaque) 	R10-19P 	2B.55 	24 x 12 	24 x 12 	36 x 18 	48 x 24 	— 	48 x 24
Photo Enforced (plaque) 	R10-19aP 	2B.55 	24 x 18 	24 x 18 	36 x 30 	48 x 36 	— 	48 x 36



Section 6F  Temporary Signs

Guidance:
11 Except as provided in Paragraph 12, signs mounted on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4 
through 6 should not be used for a duration of more than 3 days.

Option:
12 The R9-8 through R9-11a series, R11 series, W1-6 through W1-8 series, M4-10, E5-1, or other similar type signs (see Figures 6F-3, 6F-4, and 6F-5) 
may be used on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4 through 6 for longer than 3 days.

Support:
13 Methods of mounting signs other than on posts are illustrated in Figure 6F-2.




Section 6B.01 Fundamental Principles of Temporary Traffic Control

Support:
01 Construction, maintenance, utility, and incident zones can all benefit from TTC to compensate for the unexpected or unusual situations 
faced by road users. When planning for TTC in these zones, it can be assumed that it is appropriate for road users to exercise caution. Even 
though road users are assumed to be using caution, special care is still needed in applying TTC techniques.



SPEED LIMIT

How does the Town of Prescott Valley determine speed limits?

The Town of Prescott Valley follows the guidelines set forth in the Arizona State Statutes and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 
to set speed limits in our town. The State Statutes allow local authorities to determine speed limits on streets based on an &quot;engineering and traffic 
investigation.&quot; The MUTCD provides the criteria that are used for the engineering study. The MUTCD states that the speed limit should be within 5 mph 
of the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic (the speed at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling at or less than). It also allows consideration 
of road characteristics, roadside development, parking and pedestrian activity, and crash experience. Most of our studies are in areas where the roadside 
environment is changing due to development or where we have an inordinately high number of accidents. Studies may also be based on citizen requests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your state requires signage, than that sign almost certainly must meet the definitions of the MUTCD, since every other sign and all traffic control devices nationally must adhere to this manual.</p>
<p>The Federal Standard for regulatory signs, the MUTCD states several things that apply to Photo Radar signs-  but most importantly that there is a minimum height of 5 feet in rural areas and 7 feet in urban areas from the pavement to the bottom of the sign.</p>
<p>Unless there is CONSTRUCTION, or another temporary street condition (an accident, a damage street)- i.e., if the radar van and sign are used in a NORMAL street, non-temporary state- the MUTCD is quite clear-<br />
5 feet rural, 7 feet city.</p>
<p>Your state or city may say something like, &#8220;as the Traffic Engineer deems PRACTICAL&#8221;&#8211;  so you may have to show that it&#8217;s practical to use a removable method of posting the sign on an existing support to allow it to be 7 feet off the ground.&#8221;  So, the devil is in the details.</p>
<p>The best advice is to show the city attorney that you will fight, and that you will fight with an attorney. Get an attorney to submit a MOTION TO DISMISS before it gets to court. Your chances of winning in front of a judge is practically nil-  even when the city is breaking the law.  City and County Courts exist simply to make money for the city. They are not going to give in easily. YOu have to make them realize that you will be more trouble than is worth their time.</p>
<p>Get  your facts straight, get your evidence, use the MUTCD and specific sections for reference, and if at all possible, get an attorney to submit your motion to dismiss before your court date.</p>
<p>Section 2A.18 Mounting Height</p>
<p>Standard:<br />
01 The provisions of this Section shall apply unless specifically stated otherwise for a particular sign or object marker elsewhere in this Manual.</p>
<p>Support:<br />
02 The mounting height requirements for object markers are provided in Chapter 2C.</p>
<p>03 In addition to the provisions of this Section, information affecting the minimum mounting height of signs as a function of crash performance can be<br />
found in AASHTO&#8217;s &#8220;Roadside Design Guide&#8221; (see Section 1A.11).</p>
<p>Standard:<br />
04 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the pavement, of signs installed at the side<br />
of the road in rural areas shall be 5 feet (see Figure 2A-2).</p>
<p>05 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the top of the curb, or in the absence of curb, measured vertically from the<br />
bottom of the sign to the elevation of the near edge of the traveled way, of signs installed at the side of the road in business, commercial, or residential<br />
areas where parking or pedestrian movements are likely to occur, or where the view of the sign might be obstructed, shall be 7 feet (see Figure 2A-2).</p>
<p>Option:<br />
06 The height to the bottom of a secondary sign mounted below another sign may be 1 foot less than the height specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5.</p>
<p>Standard:<br />
07 The minimum height, measured vertically from the bottom of the sign to the sidewalk, of signs installed above sidewalks shall be 7 feet.</p>
<p>08 If the bottom of a secondary sign that is mounted below another sign is mounted lower than 7 feet above a pedestrian sidewalk or pathway<br />
(see Section 6D.02), the secondary sign shall not project more than 4 inches into the pedestrian facility.</p>
<p>Traffic Laws<br />
Photo Enforced 	R10-18 	2B.55 	36 x 24 	36 x 24 	48 x 30 	54 x 36 	— 	54 x 36<br />
Photo Enforced (symbol plaque) 	R10-19P 	2B.55 	24 x 12 	24 x 12 	36 x 18 	48 x 24 	— 	48 x 24<br />
Photo Enforced (plaque) 	R10-19aP 	2B.55 	24 x 18 	24 x 18 	36 x 30 	48 x 36 	— 	48 x 36</p>
<p>Section 6F  Temporary Signs</p>
<p>Guidance:<br />
11 Except as provided in Paragraph 12, signs mounted on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4<br />
through 6 should not be used for a duration of more than 3 days.</p>
<p>Option:<br />
12 The R9-8 through R9-11a series, R11 series, W1-6 through W1-8 series, M4-10, E5-1, or other similar type signs (see Figures 6F-3, 6F-4, and 6F-5)<br />
may be used on portable sign supports that do not meet the minimum mounting heights provided in Paragraphs 4 through 6 for longer than 3 days.</p>
<p>Support:<br />
13 Methods of mounting signs other than on posts are illustrated in Figure 6F-2.</p>
<p>Section 6B.01 Fundamental Principles of Temporary Traffic Control</p>
<p>Support:<br />
01 Construction, maintenance, utility, and incident zones can all benefit from TTC to compensate for the unexpected or unusual situations<br />
faced by road users. When planning for TTC in these zones, it can be assumed that it is appropriate for road users to exercise caution. Even<br />
though road users are assumed to be using caution, special care is still needed in applying TTC techniques.</p>
<p>SPEED LIMIT</p>
<p>How does the Town of Prescott Valley determine speed limits?</p>
<p>The Town of Prescott Valley follows the guidelines set forth in the Arizona State Statutes and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)<br />
to set speed limits in our town. The State Statutes allow local authorities to determine speed limits on streets based on an &#8220;engineering and traffic<br />
investigation.&#8221; The MUTCD provides the criteria that are used for the engineering study. The MUTCD states that the speed limit should be within 5 mph<br />
of the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic (the speed at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling at or less than). It also allows consideration<br />
of road characteristics, roadside development, parking and pedestrian activity, and crash experience. Most of our studies are in areas where the roadside<br />
environment is changing due to development or where we have an inordinately high number of accidents. Studies may also be based on citizen requests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rental Car Companies Cashing In on Photo Enforcement! by john</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2009/04/13/rental-car-companies-cashing-in-on-photo-enforcement/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got billed 40.00 from VMS for a toll. Called them to dispute it. They claimed the 40.00 fee was for them to research &amp; provide the renters info to the toll company. This is for them to provide the renters info that the car rental company already has in their data base. I knew was gonna be charged the toll fee &amp; fines from the toll company.  I rented the car from Fox car rental in Orange County California.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got billed 40.00 from VMS for a toll. Called them to dispute it. They claimed the 40.00 fee was for them to research &amp; provide the renters info to the toll company. This is for them to provide the renters info that the car rental company already has in their data base. I knew was gonna be charged the toll fee &amp; fines from the toll company.  I rented the car from Fox car rental in Orange County California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rental Car Companies Cashing In on Photo Enforcement! by Julie</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2009/04/13/rental-car-companies-cashing-in-on-photo-enforcement/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just had an experience with VMS out of Montana.  All you need to do to get rid of the VMS fee is prove to them you have paid your ticket or toll.  Once you show them that you paid, they will get rid of the fee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had an experience with VMS out of Montana.  All you need to do to get rid of the VMS fee is prove to them you have paid your ticket or toll.  Once you show them that you paid, they will get rid of the fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Light Ticket Beaten by Joy Bolex</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2011/05/06/red-light-ticket-beaten/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy Bolex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=337#comment-383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, I also received the same ticket as the right turn on the red light in hayward! The light basically flashed before I turned and almost blinded me, then I could not tell that the light was either red or green, so i kept going?? I do you think I should beat this? Any comments? thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I also received the same ticket as the right turn on the red light in hayward! The light basically flashed before I turned and almost blinded me, then I could not tell that the light was either red or green, so i kept going?? I do you think I should beat this? Any comments? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rental Car Companies Cashing In on Photo Enforcement! by John</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2009/04/13/rental-car-companies-cashing-in-on-photo-enforcement/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does contacting VMS after having received notice of them charging with my credit card with the service fee constitute me having been &quot;properly served&quot; with the violation?  An AZ lawyer told me that someone has to personally hand me the citation in order to count as being properly served, but because I contacted VMS before the actual citation even arrived constitute acknowledgement of service?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does contacting VMS after having received notice of them charging with my credit card with the service fee constitute me having been &#8220;properly served&#8221; with the violation?  An AZ lawyer told me that someone has to personally hand me the citation in order to count as being properly served, but because I contacted VMS before the actual citation even arrived constitute acknowledgement of service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Chicago Cash Camera Scam: Profit The Clear Motive by The Chicago Cash Camera Scam: Profit The Clear Motive &#171; Truth2Freedom&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/the-chicago-cash-camera-scam-profit-the-clear-motive/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Chicago Cash Camera Scam: Profit The Clear Motive &#171; Truth2Freedom&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=449#comment-355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/the-chicago-cash-camera-scam-profit-the-clear-motive/ Share this:TwitterLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.      Search This Blog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/the-chicago-cash-camera-scam-profit-the-clear-motive/" rel="nofollow">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/the-chicago-cash-camera-scam-profit-the-clear-motive/</a> Share this:TwitterLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.      Search This Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Man Successfully Avoids Paying $13k in Photo Fines, Issues Guide by Mark</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/man-successfully-avoids-paying-13k-in-photo-fines-issues-guide/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=421#comment-349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to know I made some waves with Advertiser&#039;s story.

I hope my information does a lot of good for people.  Thanks for posting this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know I made some waves with Advertiser&#8217;s story.</p>
<p>I hope my information does a lot of good for people.  Thanks for posting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arizona Senate Votes Today on Photo Enforcement Bills by Senate Vote Results &#171; PhotoRadarScam Blog</title>
		<link>http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/arizona-senate-votes-today-on-photo-enforcement-bills/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senate Vote Results &#171; PhotoRadarScam Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoradarscam.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PhotoRadarScam Blog Information about Photo Speed and Radar Enforcement     &#171; Arizona Senate Votes Today on Photo Enforcement&#160;Bills [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PhotoRadarScam Blog Information about Photo Speed and Radar Enforcement     &laquo; Arizona Senate Votes Today on Photo Enforcement&nbsp;Bills [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
